Cases 81 - 90 of 1,175
Drouillard v. Jutt et al
as 2:2023cv10332
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Drouillard
Defendant:
Urwa Jutt and Urwa Khansaa, Inc. Doing business as UK Transport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Garant et al v. 11266047 Canada Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10266
Plaintiff:
Colleen Marie Garant and Korie Garant
Defendant:
11266047 Canada Inc. d/b/a Northern Alliance Logistics, a Canadian corporation and Waupaca Foundry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Manning v. Morrow et al
as 2:2023cv10213
Plaintiff:
William Manning
Defendant:
Steven Morrow and Gypsum Express, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Sharps v. Weaver
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jerry Rayy Sharps
Defendant:
Karl Almos Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Wokcik v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv10142
Plaintiff:
Zbigniew Wokcik
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Montoya v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2023cv10125
Plaintiff:
Jose Montoya
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Douglas v. Sidhu et al
as 2:2022cv13109
Plaintiff:
Erica Douglas
Defendant:
Surjit Singh Sidhu and 9280-8401 Quebec Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Baughey v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv12989
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Baughey
Defendant:
The United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Parker v. Harris et al
as 2:2022cv12993
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Parker
Defendant:
Darice Harris, Quantix SCS, LLC and Quantix SCS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hamilton v. Lafontaine Chevrolet, Inc.
as 2:2022cv12944
Plaintiff:
Bryan Calvin Hamilton
Defendant:
Lafontaine Chevrolet, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
