Cases 1 - 10 of 20
ABURADWAN v. RAMIREZ et al
as 2:2024cv06007
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD ABURADWAN
Defendant:
GREGORY E. RAMIREZ, THE CITY OF NEW YORK and THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RAMIREZ GUTIERREZ v. WINEBOW, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
OMAR A. RAMIREZ GUTIERREZ
Defendant:
WINEBOW, INC. and BRAYAN D. BAEZ-VARGAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
RONE v. RAMOS-RAMIREZ et al
as 1:2023cv20910
Plaintiff:
FRANK L RONE, II
Defendant:
YANITZA RAMOS-RAMIREZ, JOSUE ARCE, MARY ROE (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
RAMIREZ v. TRANSPORT 21, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv02722
Plaintiff:
JAVIER RAMIREZ
Defendant:
TRANSPORT 21, INC., MINSTAR TRANSPORT, INC., DANIEL TOLEDO MIELES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
RIOS et al v. GUPTA
as 2:2021cv20489
Plaintiff:
MARIA YANES RIOS and MARIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
GAURAV GUPTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIOS et al v. GUPTA et al
as 3:2021cv20489
Plaintiff:
MARIA YANES RIOS and MARIA RAMIREZ
Defendant:
GAURAV GUPTA and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAMIREZ v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2020cv04823
Defendant:
ABC CORP., SWIFT TRANSPORTATION, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
LEONIDAS RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MAGANUCO v. CABA RAMIREZ et al
as 2:2019cv18967
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, EVAN D CABA RAMIREZ, WARD TRUCKING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LOUISE MAGANUCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAMIREZ et al v. RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC. et al
as 2:2019cv06233
Plaintiff:
IRENE RAMIREZ and JUAN M RAMIREZ
Defendant:
RYDER TRUCK RENTAL INC. and CESAR DE LA ROSA GERMOSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ HIDALGO v. PEREZ
as 2:2018cv16015
Defendant:
LUCIA D PEREZ
Plaintiff:
JESUS RAMIREZ HIDALGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
