Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ross v. KEY et al
as 2:2024cv04756
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ross
Defendant:
DHL EXPRESS (USA), INC. and tyrone key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
MONTOYA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2024cv04630
Defendant:
AWILDA HERNANDEZ and US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Plaintiff:
ROSS MONTOYA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ROSS v. Brode et al
as 5:2024cv04105
Defendant:
Boyd Brode, Hyasmine Bumgardner and Judy Keller
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
ROSS et al v. MARCANO et al
as 2:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSS and GWEN WATSON
Defendant:
KENNETH RIVERA MARCANO and KATRINA DORANTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROSS v. VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION CORP.
as 2:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
WANDA ROSS
Defendant:
VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ROSS et al v. THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
GLENN M. ROSS and MARTHA ROSS
Defendant:
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSS et al v. SINGH et al
as 2:2020cv01254
Plaintiff:
DENISE MARIE ROSS and ALVIN ROSS
Defendant:
PB 65 TRANSPORT, INC, GAYNOR TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC, MATTHEW L. MURDOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROSS et al v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2019cv05841
Plaintiff:
SHEILA ROSS and MIGUEL ALMANZA
Defendant:
GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSS et al v. FINN-HENRY et al
as 2:2018cv02204
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN ROSS and ROBERT ROSS
Defendant:
KAYLEE FINN-HENRY, ALICE FINN and FINN BROTHERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSS v. KAZMI
as 2:2013cv06965
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRA ROSS
Defendant:
ZAFAR KAZMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
