Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2022cv01018
Plaintiff:
Haley Van Escobar
Defendant:
United States, United States Postal Service and Jane and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Van Escobar v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv05542
Plaintiff:
Haley Van Escobar and Haley Van Ens
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and Jane and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Coombs et al v. Alimak Group USA Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01715
Defendant:
Alimak Group USA, Inc., Harold Powell, Alimak Group USA Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Louie and Jonathan Coombs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Scott et al v. Monroe et al
as 2:2020cv01550
Defendant:
Deric K Monroe, Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC, Swift Transportation Co and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lynn Scott, Mohamed S Moussamir, Nouhaylan N Moussamir and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stein v. Synergy Trucking LTD et al
as 3:2019cv06090
Defendant:
Gurjeet Sran, Synergy Trucking LTD, Jane Doe Sran and others
Plaintiff:
Ginger Stein and Ginger L Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Putterman v. Supreme Chain Logistics, LTD et al
as 2:2018cv00376
Plaintiff:
Julie S. Putterman
Defendant:
Supreme Chain Logistics, LTD , Davinder S. Neele , Jane Doe Neele and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeSantos et al v. Bourland et al
as 3:2015cv05366
Plaintiff:
Kenneth DeSantos , Nilda DeSantos , Gregorio Lomibao and others
Defendant:
Laura Lee Bourland , Halliday Associates, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bednarik v. Yamaha Motor Corporation USA et al
as 3:2007cv05651
Plaintiff:
David William Bednarik
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation USA, Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America, Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
