Cases 1 - 10 of 63
WATERS et al v. AVERSA
as 2:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
CHAD WATERS and SCOTT WATERS
Defendant:
SHIRLEY AVERSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wertz v. Greenewald
as 5:2024cv01611
Plaintiff:
Scott Wertz
Defendant:
Robert Greenewald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
VIRGO et al v. BARREAU et al
as 2:2023cv05059
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO VIRGO and STACIA SCOTT
Defendant:
DAVID BARREAU and PATRIOT TRANSPORT, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
VIRGO et al v. BARREAU et al
as 5:2023cv05059
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO M. VIRGO and STACIA SCOTT
Defendant:
DAVID BARREAU and PATRIOT TRANSPORT, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Schonbrun et al v. Sigman et al
as 2:2023cv04302
Plaintiff:
Arnold Schonbrun and Joyce Schonbrun
Defendant:
Scott Sigman and National General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Sigman et al v. Schonbrun
as 2:2023cv04112
Plaintiff:
Scott Sigman and Pamela Sigman
Defendant:
Arnold Schonbrun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
LM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2023cv02536
Plaintiff:
LM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.
Defendant:
LAWRENCE M SCOTT, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL LTD. and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Property Damage
HANIXMAN v. HARLESS et al
as 2:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
SCOTT HANIXMAN
Defendant:
BENJAMIN HARLESS and HONDA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MARIN et al v. MORRIS
as 2:2022cv04714
Plaintiff:
LUIS MARIN and MARIA MARIN
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCOTT MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
WINGARD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv01738
Plaintiff:
SCOTT E. WINGARD
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
