Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Ivy v. Doe et al
as 2:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
Eldridge Ivy
Defendant:
John Doe, ArcelorMittal LLC and Grange Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laux v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Cole Laux
Defendant:
City of Dallas and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROBERTS v. SOUL CIRCUS INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00684
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and SOUL CIRCUS INC.
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson v. Lowe's Companies Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00124
Plaintiff:
Denise Johnson
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies Inc and John Doe
Mediator:
Bob Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINSTER v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2014cv01310
Defendant:
CITY OF ANDERSON, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FINSTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WYRICK v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00501
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC and LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILLIAM WYRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rangel v. Sanders et al
as 2:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Adrian G Rangel
Defendant:
Crystal Sanders, John Doe, Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEMMON v. BELTERRA RESORT INDIANA, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00091
Defendant:
BELTERRA RESORT INDIANA, LLC, BURNS ENTERPRISES, INC., BURNS JANITOR SERVICE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA J. LEMMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Matrau v. Menard Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00683
Plaintiff:
Charles E Matrau
Defendant:
Menard Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
