Cases 31 - 40 of 174
Williams v. Geddes et al
as 7:2021cv01227
Defendant:
Bi-Lo LLC, Southeastern Grocers Inc, Frank Geddes and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. South Carolina CVS Pharmacy LLC
as 8:2021cv00687
Plaintiff:
Mary D Williams
Defendant:
South Carolina CVS Pharmacy LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glasper v. Blackbaud Inc
as 3:2020cv04393
Defendant:
Blackbaud Inc
Plaintiff:
William Glasper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beatty et al v. Broadway Amusement Rides, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv03715
Plaintiff:
Jillian McGovern, Ally Mulcahy and John Beatty
Defendant:
William H Prescott, IV and Broadway Amusement Rides, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Circle K Stores, Inc
as 4:2020cv03263
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc
Plaintiff:
Louetta Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Williams v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv03175
Defendant:
Quinthian Folk-Ginn, AT&T Corp. and Barnwell Police Department, City of
Plaintiff:
Randolph S. Williams, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Madden et al v. Petland Summerville LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02953
Plaintiff:
Tim Madden, Shatara Brown, Quinn Williams and others
Defendant:
Debra Parker, Petland Inc, Kristen Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv02929
Defendant:
Marlena H. Williams, Rita Metts and Henry McMaster
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Williams and Robert Lee Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nance-Williams v. Target Stores et al
as 2:2020cv01584
Plaintiff:
Gloria Nance-Williams
Defendant:
Target Corporate Services Inc, Target Stores, Target Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Walmart Stores East LP et al
as 5:2020cv01090
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East LP and Wal-Mart Inc
Plaintiff:
Gary Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
