Cases 31 - 40 of 117
JONES v. SANDS BETHWORKS GAMING, LLC
as 5:2017cv04398
Plaintiff:
JEAN JONES
Defendant:
SANDS BETHWORKS GAMING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. SKYVIEW MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02347
Plaintiff:
ANGELA H. JONES
Defendant:
SKYVIEW MANAGEMENT, LLC , VRAJ BRIG PA, LLC and WYNDHAM HOTEL GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. OLD NAVY, LLC
as 2:2017cv01550
Plaintiff:
SHANDA JONES
Defendant:
OLD NAVY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. FC USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01126
Plaintiff:
SHANNON JONES
Defendant:
FC USA, INC., AMR GP HOLDINGS, LLC and AMRESORTS, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JONES v. JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURT 3
as 2:2016cv06453
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
JUSTICE OF THE PEACE COURT 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05971
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE JONES
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KERRIGAN v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv02173
Plaintiff:
ROSALIE KERRIGAN
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bragg v. Jones et al
as 4:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
Cassidy D. Bragg
Defendant:
John D. Jones and J&M Property Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., NO. 2287
as 2:2015cv01567
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE JONES and RICHARD JONES
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLEMAN v. U.S. SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2015cv05385
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. COLEMAN
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA), THE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY APPELLATE BOARD (OPRAB) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
