Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Hicks v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 8:2010cv00986
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hicks
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reece-Woods v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00676
Plaintiff:
Julia Reece-Woods
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Maryland Transit Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv01063
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Smith
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Huggins v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2009cv00444
Plaintiff:
Madonna Huggins
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Walker v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 8:2009cv00272
Plaintiff:
Marva Walker
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, CSX Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Culbreath v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2008cv03328
Plaintiff:
Cherra Culbreath
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Newbill v. Amtrack et al
as 1:2007cv02663
Plaintiff:
Crosby Newbill
Defendant:
Amtrack, Amtrack, Amtrack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Glenn v. Mass Transit Administration, et al
as 1:2007cv00047
Plaintiff:
Maurice W. Glenn, Jr.
Defendant:
Mass Transit Administration
Movant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
