Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Jackson et al v. Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10681
Plaintiff:
Kristy Jackson , J.J. and O.C.
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Warren et al v. Flint et al
as 2:2017cv10679
Plaintiff:
Lynetta Warren , C.W. , L.R. and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Upchurch et al v. City of Flint, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2017cv10400
Plaintiff:
Darlene Upchurch and A.B.
Defendant:
City of Flint, a municipal corporation, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sirls et al v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2017cv10342
Plaintiff:
Marlana Sirls , Felix Sirils , A. S.1. and others
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Richard Dale Snyder, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. WMATA
as 1:2016cv00359
Defendant:
WMATA
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Cracker Barrell Old Country Store
as 3:2015cv00954
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Jones
Defendant:
Cracker Barrell Old Country Store
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palaxar Group LLC, et al v. Shane Williams, et al
as 14-14969
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PALAXAR GROUP LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability Company and PALAXAR HOLDINGS LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability Company
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANE WILLIAMS, JAY STOLLENWERK, JODI DONALDSON JAIMAN and others
Scott et al v. A Russo Wrecking, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv05938
Plaintiff:
Emma Scott and Robert Scott
Defendant:
A Russo Wrecking, Inc., ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Janitorial Northeast, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Taylor v. Williamson et al
as 1:2007cv00201
Plaintiff:
Stacy Z. Taylor
Defendant:
Robert Scott Williamson, Arvind Kumar and Laxmi Kumar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
