Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Bradley v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01714
Plaintiff:
Roger David Bradley
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gessel v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01474
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Gessel
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hofmann v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01412
Plaintiff:
Roger F. Hofmann
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amos v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01289
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Amos
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curfman v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01279
Plaintiff:
Roger Curfman
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salser v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01025
Plaintiff:
Roger Dee Salser
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Law, et al v. Lowe's Home Centers Inc.
as 5:2013cv01154
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roger Law and Elizabeth Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company
as 2:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Martin
Defendant:
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company C-8 Personal Injury Litigation
as 2:2013md02433
Plaintiff:
Anita Yerby, Roberta Sue Daugherty-Hall, Kathryn J. Post and others
Interested Party:
National Geographic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Kiel v. Department of Municipality of Trenton Ohio et al
as 1:2009cv00837
Plaintiff:
James P Kiel
Defendant:
Trenton Police Department, Mark Walls, Randy T Roger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
