Cases 61 - 70 of 198
Marcello v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2021cv00153
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company, Starbucks Corporation, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Polo Marcello and Lara Taina Ga Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ephran-Dome v. Starbucks Corporation
as 4:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Ephran-Dome
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nieves v. Starbucks Coffee Company et al
as 1:2021cv00310
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Catherine Nieves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Funaki v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2021cv00210
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Plaintiff:
Kohei Funaki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Espirel v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2020cv10881
Plaintiff:
Robert Espirel
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr
Edmonson v. Starbucks Corporation
as 5:2020cv01461
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
AMANDA EDMONSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. HMS HOST FAMILY RESTAURANTS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv20128
Defendant:
HMS HOST FAMILY RESTAURANTS, INC. and STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
v. HMS HOST FAMILY RESTAURANTS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv20130
Defendant:
HMS HOST FAMILY RESTAURANTS, INC. and STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHMIDT v. HMS HOST FAMILY RESTAURANTS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv20130
Defendant:
HMS HOST FAMILY RESTAURANTS, INC. and STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
LYUDMILA SHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAOUD v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION dba STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv19106
Defendant:
STARBUCKS CORPORATION dba STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah DAOUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
