Cases 71 - 80 of 366
MELBOURN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2019cv04963
Plaintiff:
LAUREEN MELBOURN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOTTONE et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04856
Defendant:
WAL-MART EAST, INC., WAL-MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST, WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARY BOTTONE and JOHN RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BADMAN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04246
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, BRENDA MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
NAOMI M. BADMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roman et al v. Wal-Mart et al
as 3:2019cv01469
Plaintiff:
Luz Roman and George Roman
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., Wal-Mart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Werts et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01463
Plaintiff:
Donald Werts and Billie J. Werts
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRISON et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2019cv03545
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MORRISON and DANA MORRISON
Defendant:
WAL-MART SUPERCENTER #3541 and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILSON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2019cv03217
Plaintiff:
DENISE WILSON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DUBOSE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2019cv02876
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN DUBOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. Wal-Mart USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00937
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Carter
Defendant:
Wal-Mart USA, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADDEN v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 2:2019cv02252
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WALMART INC., WALMART STORES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MADDEN and MADELL MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
