Cases 1 - 8 of 8
EVERETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv04392
Plaintiff:
DERRICK EVERETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHALL JOHN DOE and UNITED STATES MARSHALL RICHARD ROE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOE, BY AND THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND, JULIE ROE v. NORTH PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2020cv05139
Defendant:
NORTH PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, BY AND THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND, JULIE ROE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. WP COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01433
Defendant:
ROES 3-10, KEVIN SMITH, WP COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMNER v. SYLVESTER et al
as 4:2017cv00600
Plaintiff:
Jordyn Simner
Defendant:
Robert Silvestre, Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity , Phi Ro and others
Cross_claimant:
The Grand Chapter of Phi Sigma Kappa, Inc. , Smith Morris Group, LLC , Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity and others
Cross_defendant:
John Doe, Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity , KAPPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JANE DOE et al v. NESSET
as 1:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE , "ERIN" , "VICKY" and others
Defendant:
KIRK NESSET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ZALESKI v. MELT RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv02551
Plaintiff:
CAROL ANN ZALESKI and DAVID ZALESKI
Defendant:
MELT RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC and JOHN DOES (1-10) AND/OR RICHARD ROES (1-10),
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWDEN et al v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv01028
Plaintiff:
DIANNE LOWDEN and JAY LOWDEN
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION , TARGET STORE #2496 , ABC, INC. (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
BARNES et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
LARRY BARNES , WOODROW BENNETT , SCOT BRANTLEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
