Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stock v. Carilion Clinic et al
as 7:2021cv00433
Plaintiff:
Karl K. Stock
Defendant:
Carilion Clinic and Carilion Medical Center doing business as Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry et al v. Virginia Hospital Center Arlington Health System et al
as 1:2020cv01018
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson and Jaye Gentry
Defendant:
Virginia Hospital Center Physician Group, LLC, Virginia Hospital Center Arlington Health System, Rupali K. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Carroll v. Donohue et al
as 4:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Dr. John H Donohue, Riverside Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Riverside Regional Medical Center, Riverside Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Riverside Surgical Specialists and others
Plaintiff:
Debra K Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kimble v. Rajpal et al
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
John B. Kimble
Defendant:
Rajesh K. Rajpal and Rajesh Rajpal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Cassady v. Gehrken, Jr. et al
as 4:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
Dorothy K. Cassady
Defendant:
George A. Gehrken, Jr., M.D. and Piedmont Urology Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Ponciroli v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv00841
Plaintiff:
Sharon K. Ponciroli
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Robinson v. King et al
as 2:2009cv00418
Plaintiff:
James K. Robinson
Defendant:
Henry L. King, MDA Holdings, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Hancock v. Ayres
as 4:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
Shannon Hancock
Defendant:
Douglas K. Ayres, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Stone v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00990
Plaintiff:
Mary K. Stone
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2680 Federal Tort Claim Act Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
