Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Gaus et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02810
Plaintiff:
Bryan Gaus , Danielle Gaus , A.G. and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cutler v. Robert Clark Flooring LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02809
Plaintiff:
Richard Cutler and Sharon Cutler
Defendant:
Robert Clark Flooring LLC, EDLab Environmental Diagnostics Laboratory and Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMAS et al v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC
as 1:2017cv02808
Plaintiff:
Kathy Thomas and David Thomas
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McHugh et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02807
Plaintiff:
Thomas McHugh , Brenda Jenkins , Darius Gandhi and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks v. Lumber Liquidators Inc et al
as 1:2017cv02806
Plaintiff:
Mildred Parks
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spence et al v. Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02805
Plaintiff:
Dwight Spence , Mitchell Spence , diana spence and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02803
Plaintiff:
George Sanchez and Maria Sanchez
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christman v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02802
Plaintiff:
Julie Christman
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Balderson et al v. Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02798
Plaintiff:
Thomas Balderson and Barbara Balderson
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchem et al v. Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02797
Plaintiff:
Russell Mitchem and Wanda Mitchem
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
