Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Johnson et al v. Cook Medical Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv10645
Plaintiff:
Larry Johnson and Brenda Johnson
Defendant:
Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Incorporated and William Cook Europe ApS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Glynn et al
as 2:2015cv10458
Plaintiff:
Patricia Brooks
Defendant:
Edmound Glynn, Bettie Milton, Betty Kemp and others
Noe v. King Technology, Inc.
as 4:2014cv12988
Plaintiff:
William Noe
Defendant:
King Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clementz et al v. Cook Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01110
Plaintiff:
Connie Clementz and Roger Clementz
Defendant:
Cook Group, Inc., Cook, Inc., Cook Biotech, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. The Winner Group et al
as 2:2012cv12210
Plaintiff:
William Doe
Defendant:
The Winner Group and Refong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
williams v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv12084
Plaintiff:
robert j williams
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heydenberk et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Pamela Heydenberk and William Heydenberk
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heydenberk et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00222
Plaintiff:
Pamela Heydenberk and William Heydenberk
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
as 1:2011cv14432
Plaintiff:
William A Jones and Sharleen Jones
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malcom v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv13595
Plaintiff:
William L Malcom
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and DePuy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
