Cases 41 - 50 of 162
Wartelle et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01399
Plaintiff:
Julie Wartelle and Lastrapes Wartelle, II
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strantz, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., et al
as 4:2012cv02099
Plaintiff:
Kelly Strantz , Suzanne Prael , Donna Behnke and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pasfield et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01317
Plaintiff:
Janet Pasfield and Robert Pasfield
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Weger v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01108
Plaintiff:
Alice Weger
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Mentor Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vance et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01073
Plaintiff:
Una Vance and Lee Vance
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brannen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01429
Plaintiff:
Isebell Brannen , April Kowalsky , Donna Benedetto and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayne v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01039
Plaintiff:
Marjaree Mayne
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2012cv01020
Plaintiff:
Linda Griffith
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everhart v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01019
Plaintiff:
Corene Everhart
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monto v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01010
Plaintiff:
Bridget M. Monto
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
