Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Bates et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2012cv00067
Plaintiff:
Dana Bates , Charles Bates , Sandra Foster and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shama v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02573
Plaintiff:
Patricia Shama
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore, et.al. v. Davol, Inc., et.al.
as 3:2011cv00487
Plaintiff:
Charles Frederick Moore and Cynthia Gale Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waller v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02229
Plaintiff:
David H. Waller
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00749
Plaintiff:
Barry M. Smith, Barry M. Smith, Sherry Smith and others
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Don - Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Southern Tennessee Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Humphrey et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Humphrey, Kenneth Humphrey, Carolyn J Humphrey and others
Defendant:
Davol Inc, Davol Inc, C.R. Bard, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
French et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00301
Plaintiff:
Hugh French, Hugh French, Hugh French and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McDowell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Homer McDowell and Homer McDowell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Murrey et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00229
Plaintiff:
Grace Murrey and Edward Murrey, IV
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
