Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Johnson et al v. 3M Company
as 3:2019cv00210
Plaintiff:
Lynneta White-Johnson and Dorian C. Johnson
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Robin Kennedy v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Does One through Fifty, inclusive and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Robin Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Andrew Bridges v. 3M Company
as 2:2019cv00327
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bridges
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kim Thompson v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2017cv00006
Defendant:
3M Company, Does and Ingram Micro, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kim Thompson
Broussard v. 3M Company
as 1:2016cv00462
Plaintiff:
Shirley Broussard
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James D. Heffernan v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2015cv08835
Defendant:
3M Company, Arizant Healthcare, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
James D Heffernan
Padilla et al v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2011cv06678
Plaintiff:
Jose Padilla and Maria Padilla
Defendant:
3M Company , Safewaze and Aearo Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tysver et al v. Foster Wheeler Corporation, et al.
as 4:2011cv02954
Plaintiff:
Sally Joann Tysver , Jody Ann Paulsen , Steve Tysver and others
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Corporation , Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., Astra Flooring Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Olschewske et al v. Asbestos Defendants
as 4:2010cv01729
Plaintiff:
Linda Olschewske , Thomas R. Olschewske and Ellamae Pike
Defendant:
Asbestos Defendants , Rockwell Automation, Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Olschewske et al v. Asbestos Defendants
as 3:2010cv01729
Defendant:
Standco, Inc., General Motors Corporation, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Olschewske, Ellamae Pike and Thomas R. Olschewske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
