Cases 71 - 80 of 162
Anglian v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00901
Plaintiff:
Lisa Anglian
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moses et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00891
Plaintiff:
Wilder Moses and Robert Moses
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sneed v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00882
Plaintiff:
Andra Sneed
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00872
Plaintiff:
Anita Phillips
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medcoff et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00875
Plaintiff:
Marian Medcoff and Roy Langston Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00874
Plaintiff:
Judith Rodriguez and Benjamin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holdrege et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00873
Plaintiff:
Juliebeth Holdrege and Bill Holdrege
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deakins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00871
Plaintiff:
Lucille Deakins and Donald Deakins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00857
Plaintiff:
Sharon Hamilton and Jim Hamilton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ginn et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00864
Plaintiff:
Rita Ginn and Don Ginn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
