Cases 81 - 90 of 575
Pearson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01905
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilcox v. Drost Land Company, LLC et al
as 6:2020cv02242
Defendant:
Lawrence Drost and Drost Land Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lisa Wilcox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01902
Plaintiff:
Gwen Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Govig v. Probake Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01999
Defendant:
Probake Inc. and ING. Polin & C.S.P.A.
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Govig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baldwin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01903
Plaintiff:
Sally Virginia Baldwin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Konoloff et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2020cv01622
Defendant:
Subaru Corporation, Safeco Insurance Company of America, Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Nichole L. Konoloff and Jason Eaves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. Thomson International, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01284
Defendant:
Thompson Internation, Inc. and Thomson International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 6:2020cv01518
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, McKesson Corporation, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Kristan Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davies v. Thompson International, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01285
Plaintiff:
Lorie Davis and Lori Davies
Defendant:
Thompson International and Thomson International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dikes et al v. Mata et al
as 3:2020cv00916
Defendant:
Stewart Transportation, Inc. aka Stewart Enterprises, Inc. and Rigoberto Mata
Plaintiff:
Robert Dikes and Kimberly Dikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
