Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ortega v. Gala Industries et al
as 5:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Cala Ortega
Defendant:
Gala Industries and Maag Gala, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
DIAZ v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
LORENZO DIAZ
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FRANCIS v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv04824
Plaintiff:
SHAWN LORENZO FRANCIS
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES INC., CHATTEM, INC. and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAGAGNOLI et al v. WEGMANS ALLENTOWN et al
as 5:2015cv03386
Plaintiff:
NEYSI MAGAGNOLI and LORENZO MAGAGNOLI
Defendant:
WEGMANS ALLENTOWN, WEGMANS FOOD MARKETS, INC. , BIRD BRAIN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLORES et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05872
Plaintiff:
SANTIAGO FLORES , DORETHA ANDERSON , REBECCA BARBER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AUD et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv05865
Plaintiff:
JANICE AUD , RENETTA BARNES , SAMUEL BIGBOY, II and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUNIZ et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05835
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA MUNIZ , DEBRA PARDUS , JEROME ROSS and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
QUILES et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2008cv02189
Plaintiff:
RAUL ZAMBRANA- QUILES, JANE DOE 1, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ZAMBRANA DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
