Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Roberson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14036
Plaintiff:
Gregory Roberson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14844
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sanford Samuel Stone and Alexis Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owens v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13448
Plaintiff:
James W Owens
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv10502
Plaintiff:
Dennis P. Patton
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cannon v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv13445
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cannon
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Szukhent et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv12959
Plaintiff:
Roland Szukhent and Jean Szukhent
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
williams v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 2:2012cv12084
Plaintiff:
robert j williams
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chechak v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 2:2012cv10793
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Chechak
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calvert v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc
as 2:2012cv10179
Plaintiff:
John B. Calvert
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMeekan et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01119
Plaintiff:
Roger McMeekan and Leona McMeekan
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
