Cases 1 - 8 of 8
White-Hoppe v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 0:2022cv01482
Plaintiff:
Alice White-Hoppe
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation, Howmedica Osteonics Corp doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cecil et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp, a New Jersey Corp D/B/A Stryker Orthopaedics et al
as 0:2019cv02164
Defendant:
Stryker Sales Corp., Stryker Corp. and Howmedica Osteonics Corp, a New Jersey Corp D/B/A Stryker Orthopaedics
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Cecil and Paula G. Cecil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Messina et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 0:2015cv00626
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Messina and Susan Messina
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maguire v. Stryker Corp. et al
as 0:2014cv02198
Plaintiff:
Frances L. Maguire
Defendant:
Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corp., Stryker Ireland Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv00192
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Davidson
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp., d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics
Case Filed In Error.
as 0:2013cv03487
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cash
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sale Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp., dba Stryker Orthopedics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 0:2013cv02404
Plaintiff:
Seferino Hernandez
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaarbo et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv05848
Plaintiff:
Michael Kaarbo and Diane Kaarbo
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Stryker Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, Stryker Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
