Cases 1 - 10 of 14
SMITH v. DANSONS US, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
GARY SMITH
Defendant:
DANSONS US, LLC, WALMART, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
BEAVEN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00003
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
MADISON BEAVEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EMLEY et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv02350
Plaintiff:
DENNIS EMLEY and DONNA EMLEY
Defendant:
L.N.K. INTERNATIONAL, INC. and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
STACY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01494
Defendant:
NOVOLEX and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
HEATHER STACY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
D. v. ALLEN COMPANY et al
as 1:2015cv01102
Defendant:
ALLEN COMPANY and WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Plaintiff:
D. L. D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
COLWELL et al v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 4:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
HUBERT COLWELL and IMOGENE COLWELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WHITLOCK v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 4:2013cv00158
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY WHITLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JENT v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 4:2013cv00154
Plaintiff:
GEORGE L. JENT
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
NOBLE et al v. HUSQVARNA CONSUMER OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, N.A., INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00195
Defendant:
HUSQVARNA CONSUMER OUTDOOR PRODUCTS, N.A., INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY NOBLE and RITA NOBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 4:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
EVELYN JOHNSON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
