Cases 151 - 160 of 459
Flanagan v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Gerald Flanagan
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCullough v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 1:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Aubrey McCullough
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stout v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 2:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
James Stout
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milam et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ray F. Milam and Jennifer Milam
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dollar, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al.
as 2:2017cv02363
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Dollar and Michael Dollar
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Johnson & Johnson et al (TV3)
as 1:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Carla Nichols
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burdge v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv02355
Plaintiff:
Robert Burdge
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Inc. Ethicon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McWhorter v. C.R. Bard, Inc. (RLJ2)
as 1:2017cv00089
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. (RLJ2) and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
McWhorter and Sharon Yolanda McWhorter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson-Fairbanks v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00713
Plaintiff:
Stacy Wilson-Fairbanks
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bell v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
Trace Bell
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
