Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Martines v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02260
Plaintiff:
Devin Martines
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv01477
Plaintiff:
Dorothy A. Martin
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALONZO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2017cv04641
Plaintiff:
JACK MARTIN ALONZO
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04143
Plaintiff:
Ethelinda Martin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARCIA et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv02738
Plaintiff:
Martin Garcia and Carmen Garcia
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02782
Plaintiff:
Robert Gentry, Elizabeth Brady, Michelle Ayala and others
Defendant:
Does 1 - 50, Ethicon, Inc., Covidien, LP and others
Not Classified By Court:
Exponent Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Metzger v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv04111
Plaintiff:
Martin Metzger
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bottjer et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC
as 4:2013cv00356
Plaintiff:
Sherry Bottjer and Martin Bottjer
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00329
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MARTINEZ and MARTIN MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC and COLOPLAST CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Mentor Worldwide, LLC
as 4:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Jean Martin
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
