Cases 91 - 100 of 1,143
PENDLETON et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2022cv01242
Plaintiff:
DREW PENDLETON, SYLVIA MCDANIEL, JIM WOLFF and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAWTON et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv03294
Plaintiff:
LEO W. LAWTON, JR. and KIMBERLY J. LAWTON
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., UMB BANK, MANLEY, DEAS & KOCHALSKI LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
DAKIEVA v. VOLODYMYR KURYLO, et. al.
as 2:2022cv03177
Defendant:
VOLODYMYR KURYLO, VA LOGISTICS, INC, VOLODYA and others
Plaintiff:
ALTYNGUL DAKIEVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
TRIDENT E&P, LLC v. HP, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03030
Plaintiff:
TRIDENT E&P, LLC
Defendant:
HP, INC. and HPI FEDERAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Young v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
RICK YOUNG
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lattimorre v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Heather Lattimorre
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Renn v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
Donna Renn
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Williams-Redding v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
Edda D. Williams-Redding
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Lakin v. SoClean Inc
as 2:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lakin
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PURNELL v. GOODLEAP, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02773
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN PURNELL
Defendant:
GOODLEAP, LLC, SUNRUN INC, VIVINT SOLAR, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
