Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ramos et al v. Funding Rush, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Trinidad Ramos, Diana Ramos and Eric L. Ramos
Defendant:
Funding Rush, Inc., Andrew Adrian Dioli, Ralph Martinez and others
Counter Defendant:
Lexington Mortgage Company and Lil' Wave Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Chan v. Chancelor
as 3:2009cv01839
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, Chase Home Finance LLC, Washington Mutual Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Calara, Pieterke H Beckner, Eugene Harnett and others
Cross Claimant:
Joseph A Tassi
Cross Defendant:
Grand Reserve Kirkman Orlando, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
IN RE: SONY GAMING NETWORKS AND CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
as 3:2011md02258
Plaintiff:
Arthur Howe , Fernando Lizarraga, Jr. , Adam Schucher and others
Defendant:
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC , Sony Corporation of America , Sony Network Entertainment America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holsey v. Wachovia Mortgage et al
as 2:2010cv00225
Plaintiff:
Danny L Holsey
Defendant:
Wachovia Mortgage, SMR Mortgage & Real Estate, Charon Charmaine Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Holsey v. Wachovia Mortgage et al
as 2:2010at00113
Plaintiff:
Danny L Holsey
Defendant:
Wachovia Mortgage, SMR Mortgage & Real Estate, Charon Charmaine Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tsien et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 3:2009cv04790
Plaintiff:
Andrew C. Tsien and Jenny E. Tsien
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Andrew Morres v. Metlife Home Loan et al
as 8:2009cv00817
Plaintiff:
Andrew Morres and Andrew Morres
Defendant:
Metlife Home Loan, Metlife Home Loan, Metlife Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Type:
Torts - Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
