Cases 11 - 17 of 17
LOPOSKY et al v. AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01353
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LOPOSKY and RICHARD KEMP
Defendant:
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. , ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEMARCO et al v. AVALON COMMUNITIES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00628
Plaintiff:
ALESSANDRO DEMARCO and AMANDA BAYER
Defendant:
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LORIA v. HARRAH'S ATLANTIC CITY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv04674
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA LORIA
Defendant:
HARRAH'S ATLANTIC CITY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC , JOHN DOE 1-5, MARY DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIRCHNER v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 3:2012cv01853
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KIRCHNER
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION , ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CERTAIN INTERESTED LONDON UNDERWRITERS OF LONDON ENGLAND v. MARSHALL et al
as 2:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN INTERESTED LONDON UNDERWRITERS OF LONDON ENGLAND
Defendant:
JULIAN MARSHALL, JASON RAMAGE, NEW YORK GOLD EXCHANGE III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04145
Plaintiff:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Defendant:
RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cross Claimant:
RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Cross Defendant:
RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
CALL et al v. DANIEL A. CZAPLICKI, ESQUIRE et al
as 1:2009cv02832
Plaintiff:
GREGORY W. CALL and KATHLEEN CALL
Defendant:
DANIEL A. CZAPLICKI, ESQUIRE, DANIEL A. CZAPLICKI & ASSOCIATES, P.C., BERNARD J. AUDETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
