Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Eisley et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 4:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Grayce Eisley and Jeffrey Zalick
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Pierre Investments, Inc. v. Fifth Third Bank
as 2:2021cv05312
Plaintiff:
Pierre Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank, Frank LaRose, Jeffrey Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Malek
as 1:2013cv02176
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Malek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrams et al v. Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Michael F Abrams , Angela Alle , John Amos and others
Defendant:
Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
ASKO, Inc. v. Premier Knife Company, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv01739
Plaintiff:
ASKO, Inc.
Defendant:
Premier Knife Company, LLC and Jeffrey C Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Biglin et al v. Klein Tools Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv02292
Plaintiff:
Lance Biglin, Jeffrey Doup and Arthur Jackson
Defendant:
Klein Tools Inc., Klein Tools Inc., Klein Tools Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Skelly v. National City Corporation et al
as 1:2008nc70013
Plaintiff:
Tim Skelly
Defendant:
National City Corporation, National City Corporation, Peter E. Raskind and others
Interested Party:
Richard Lerach and Charles Greve
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Skelly v. National City Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv02552
Plaintiff:
Tim Skelly
Defendant:
National City Corporation, Peter E. Raskind, Jeffrey D Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Tinner v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00091
Plaintiff:
Lakrisha Tinner
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC, Kimberly Klemenok, Eric T Kohut and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
