Cases 1 - 7 of 7
The Charitable Donor Advised Fund, L.P. et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2020cv01036
Defendant:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc., U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCATION, Brigade Capital Management, LP and others
Plaintiff:
CLO HOLDCO, LTD. and THE CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Charitable Donor Advised Fund, L.P. v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 1:2019cv09857
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
THE CHARITABLE DONOR ADVISED FUND, L.P. and Charitable Donor Advised Fund, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Markose et al v. CitiBank National Association et al
as 7:2019cv07019
Plaintiff:
Shaji Markose and Ragitha Shaji
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and CitiBank National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Wenegieme et al v. Nadel et al
as 1:2017cv06622
Plaintiff:
Celeste Wenegieme, Celestine Wenegieme, Robert Maresca and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Nadel, U.S. Bank National Association, Specialized Loan Servicing & Arch Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alam et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Shantanu Alam and Tasmiya Khan
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Alam et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Plaintiff:
Shantanu Alam and Tasmiya Khan
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association and Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Beckford v. Citibank NA, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03114
Plaintiff:
Cecil Beckford
Defendant:
Citibank NA, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association, Eric Alen Wughalter, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
