Cases 201 - 210 of 410
Nutro Company v. Bayer AG et al
as 4:2011cv01674
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer CropScience AG, Bayer BioScience NV and others
Plaintiff:
Nutro Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanley Smith Drywall, Inc. v. Munlake Contractors, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00934
Plaintiff:
Stanley Smith Drywall, Inc.
Defendant:
Munlake Contractors, Inc. and Berkley Regional Insurance Company
Malone et al v. E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Company
as 4:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Peter Malone and Kathleen Malone
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Batesville Grain & Fertilizer, LLC et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 1:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Batesville Grain & Fertilizer, LLC and Farmers Storage, Inc.
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer BioScience NV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Batesville Grain & Fertilizer, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv01427
Plaintiff:
Batesville Grain & Fertilizer, LLC and Farmers Storage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Senevey Properties, LLC v. Goodman Company, L.P. et al
as 2:2011cv04186
Plaintiff:
Senevey Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Goodman Company, L.P. and Tower Manufacturing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Senevey Properties, LLC v. Goodman Company, L.P. et al
as 4:2011cv01285
Plaintiff:
Senevey Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Goodman Company, L.P. and Tower Manufacturing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sundstrom et al v. De'Longhi America, Inc.
as 6:2011cv03256
Plaintiff:
Daphn Sundstrom and David Roper
Defendant:
De'Longhi America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lato v. General Electric Company
as 4:2011cv01105
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lato
Defendant:
General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simon v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2011cv06038
Plaintiff:
Don Simon
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
