Cases 131 - 140 of 152
Sterling Steel Company, LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
Sterling Steel Company, LLC, Sterling Steel Company, LLC, Sterling Steel Company, LLC and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Heartland Regional Medical Center et al v. Oneok, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv06048
Plaintiff:
Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant:
Oneok, Inc., Oneok Energy Marketing and Trading Company, L.P., Kansas Gas Marketing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Southeast Missouri Hospital v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00031
Plaintiff:
Southeast Missouri Hospital and Southeast Missouri Hospital
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Southeast Missouri Hospital
as 1:2007cv00030
Plaintiff:
Southeast Missouri Hospital
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Missouri Public Service Commission v. Oneok, Inc. et al
as 4:2006cv00885
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
AvidAir Helicopter Supply, Inc. v. Rolls-Royce Corporation
as 4:2006cv00816
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Ferguson Medical Group, L.P. v. Missouri Delta Medical Center et al
as 1:2006cv00008
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Otis v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company et al
as 4:2005cv01853
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Foam Supplies, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Company, The
as 4:2005cv01772
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Moberly Surgery Center, L.L.C. v. Moberly Hospital, Inc.
as 2:2005cv00059
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
