Cases 11 - 20 of 55
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01493
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC, CIGNA CORP. and ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Petitioner:
KAISER PERMANENTE HEALTH PLAN, INC., TUFTS ASSOCIATED HEALTH PLANS, INC., MERCER and others
Special Master:
RICHARD A. LEVIE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Southern Collision & Restorati v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 16-11973
Defendant / Appellee:
21ST CENTURY NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, THE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOUTHERN COLLISION & RESTORATION, LLC
Southern Collision & Restorati v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 16-11973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHERN COLLISION & RESTORATION, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Quality Auto Painting Center v. State Farm Indemnity Company, et al
as 15-14160
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUALITY AUTO PAINTING CENTER OF ROSELLE, INC., Traded as Prestige Auto Body
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc., et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 15-14179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE PAPPAS BODY SHOP, INC., DAVID C. BROSIUS, d.b.a. Martins Auto Body Works, inc., ART WALKER AUTO SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and others
:
SERVICE
Ultimate Collision Repair, In v. State Farm Indemnity Company, et al
as 15-14162
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ULTIMATE COLLISION REPAIR, INC.
Ultimate Collision Repair, In v. State Farm Indemnity Company, et al
as 15-14162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ULTIMATE COLLISION REPAIR, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY, STATE FARM GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY, PROGRESSIVE FREEDOM INSURANCE COMPANY and others
:
SERVICE
Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc., et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 15-14179
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ESURANCE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ELEPHANT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WHITEFORD COLLISION AND REFINISHING, INC., ART WALKER AUTO SERVICES, INC., DAVID C. BROSIUS, d.b.a. Martins Auto Body Works, inc. and others
Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06019
Defendant:
Donegal Mutual Insurance Company, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, State Farm General Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc., Whiteford Collision and Refinishing, Inc., David C. Brosius and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Oregon et al
as 6:2014cv06014
Defendant:
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC and Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as Leif's Auto Collision Centers
Interested Party:
Tonkon Torp, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
