Cases 11 - 16 of 16
In Re: Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2015md02626
Defendant:
ABB/Con-cise Optical Group, LLC, ABB Optical Group, 1-800-Contacts.Com and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Cristiano, Heather Butcher, Christian Miller and others
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Stetler, Benjamin W. Hewitt, Monika Pasek and others
In Re:
In Re: Disposable Contact Lens Antitrust Litigation and Evan A. Strassberg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Smith v. Coopervision, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv21069
Plaintiff:
Cora Beth Smith
Defendant:
Coopervision, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Parker Auto Body Inc et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co et al
as 6:2014cv06004
Plaintiff:
Taylor Auto Body L L C, Johnnies Paint & Body Shop Inc, Ginns Automotive Frame Shop L L C and others
Defendant:
Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, American National General Insurance Co, Travelers Indemnity Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Capitol Body Shop, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06000
Defendant:
Direct General Insurance Company of Mississippi, Allstate Property and Casualty Company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Car Care, Inc., Smith Brothers Collision Center, Inc., Alexander Body Shop, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Accord Healthcare, Inc. et al v. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv60742
Plaintiff:
Accord Healthcare, Inc. and Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Defendant:
Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. and H.D. Smith Wholesale Drug Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Grant et al v. Parker et al
as 2:2007cv00717
Plaintiff:
Nancy Jo Grant, Adeline Hudson and Johnnie Henry Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
James S. Parker, Vernon L. Keen, Donald Hartery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Antitrust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
