Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15916
Defendant / Appellee:
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Appellant:
ALEX MARTINEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15917
Defendant / Appellee:
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant:
MARGOT BRADLEY
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff:
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of Texas et al v. Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06625
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas , The State of Connecticut , The State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
Hachette Book Group, Inc., Harpercollins Publishers, LLC, Simon & Schuster, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
USA, et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich
as 11-2279
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF MICHIGAN
Defendant - Appellant:
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN
USA, et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich
as 11-1984
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF MICHIGAN
Defendant - Appellant:
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN
United States of America et al v. American Express Company et al.
as 1:2010cv04496
Interested Party:
Individual Plaintiffs in 11-md-2221, Juniper Bank, All Plaintiffs in and others
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Not Classified By Court:
Citibank, N.A., Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.
Petitioner:
US Airways, Inc., Best Buy Co., Inc, PayPal, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Express Company, Mastercard International Incorporated, Visa Inc. and others
Material Witne:
Jetblue Airways Corporation
Intervenor:
Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of Missouri et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv03619
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri , State of Arkansas , State of Michigan and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chimei Innolux Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
