Cases 51 - 56 of 56
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, MIAMI LODGE 20, INSURANCE TRUST FUND v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, MIAMI LODGE 20, INSURANCE TRUST FUND
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC., CITRON PHARMA, LLC, HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 302 AND 612 CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY HEALTH AND SECURITY FUND v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00294
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 302 AND 612 CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY HEALTH AND SECURITY FUND
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC., CITRON PHARMA, LLC, HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CESAR CASTILLO, INC. v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES INC. et al
as 2:2016cv06685
Plaintiff:
CESAR CASTILLO, INC.
Defendant:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES INC., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., MYLAN INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES INC. et al
as 2:2016cv06633
Plaintiff:
FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
Defendant:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES INC., IMPAX LABORATORIES INC., MYLAN INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Connecticut et al v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv02056
Plaintiff:
State of Connecticut , State of Delaware , State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Citron Pharma, LLC, Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND v. DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv06058
Plaintiff:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND , PHILADELPHIA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, INC. , MYLAN INC. , MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
