Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Letricia Brown v. State of California, et al
as 23-55813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LETRICIA LAVERN BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Letricia Lavern Brown v. The State of California et al
as 2:2023cv01966
Plaintiff:
Letricia Lavern Brown
Defendant:
SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES REGIONAL CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS, INC., erroneously sued herein as LOS ANGELES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, The State of California, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
In Re: Online DVD Rental Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2009md02029
Plaintiff:
Gary Bunker, John Haley, Andrea Resnick and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
A Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Walmart.com USA LLC
Interested Party:
Yahoo! Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Stephen C. Griffis, Theodore H Frank, Jill Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Andrea Resnick, et al v. Edmund Bandas, et al
as 12-15957
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ONLINE DVD RENTAL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANDREA RESNICK, BRYAN EASTMAN, AMY LATHAM and others
Appellant:
EDMUND F. BANDAS
Defendant / Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC., WALMART INC. and WALMART.COM USA LLC
In Re: Photochromic Lens Antitrust Litigation
as 8:2010md02173
Plaintiff:
Howard Achtman, Arthur L. Cartier Optics, B & B Eyes, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Essilor International SA, Essilor Laboratories of America, Inc., Essilor of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
In re: Andrea Resnick, et al v. Edmund Bandas, et al
as 12-15957
:
In re: ONLINE DVD RENTAL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREA RESNICK, BRYAN EASTMAN, AMY LATHAM and others
Objector - Appellant:
EDMUND F. BANDAS
Defendant - Appellee:
NETFLIX, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WALMART.COM USA LLC
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
Washington State, et al v. Chimei Innolux Corp., et al
as 11-16862
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Conway et al
as 3:2008cv00571
Plaintiff:
VIBO Corporation, Inc., VIBO Corporation, Inc. and VIBO Corporation, Inc.
Defendant:
Jack Conway, Troy King, Talis J. Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
