Antitrust Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
LOCAL 295 IBT EMPLOYER GROUP WELFARE FUND v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2017cv05570
Plaintiff: LOCAL 295 IBT EMPLOYER GROUP WELFARE FUND
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv04326
Defendant: JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff: NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN, LOCAL 295 IBT EMPLOYER GROUP WELFARE FUND and THE WELFARE FUND OF PLUMBERS LOCAL UNION NO. 200
Petitioner: THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
In Re: REMICADE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Interested Party: THE KROGER CO and WALGREEN CO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND v. FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01754
Plaintiff: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND
Defendant: FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC. , PERRIGO COMPANY PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS ARIZONA HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST v. ALLERGAN PLC et al
as 2:2016cv02810
Plaintiff: UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS ARIZONA HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST
Defendant: ALLERGAN PLC, ACTAVIS PLC, IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. ASTRAZENECA AB et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv04156
Plaintiff: CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY , EMPHESYS INSURANCE COMPANY , HUMANA BENEFIT PLAN OF ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Defendant: ASTRAZENECA AB , AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE , ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GREATER METROPOLITAN HOTEL EMPLOYERS-EMPLOYEES HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND et al v. ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01584
Plaintiff: GREATER METROPOLITAN HOTEL EMPLOYERS-EMPLOYEES HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , MINNESOTA CEMENT MASONS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and ROOFERS LOCAL 96 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, INC., TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO. LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06734
Plaintiff: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. , TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED, BARR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 132 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv05108
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 132 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant: MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv05105
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND
Defendant: MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MORGAN v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv05097
Plaintiff: HEATHER MORGAN
Defendant: MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?