Cases 1 - 4 of 4
IN RE: FRAGRANCE END-USER PLAINTIFF ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2023cv16127
Plaintiff:
MIRLINDA ELMAZI
Defendant:
DSM-FIRMENICH AG, FIRMENICH INTERNATIONAL SA, FIRMENICH INC. and others
In Re:
FRAGRANCE END-USER PLAINTIFF ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Consolidated Plaintiff:
YVONNE PEYCHAL
Interested Party:
ANDREA HOGAN, SANDRA KLUESSENDORF, MASEES SKENDERIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC.
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant:
WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re:
EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party:
IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner:
TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS HEADQUARTERS LLC et al v. MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC
as 2:2006cv05120
In Re:
INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS HEADQUARTERS LLC, NEW CINGULAR PLAINTIFFS, AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES INC and others
Defendant:
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC., ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., WURTTEMBERGISCHE VERSICHERUNG A.G. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
OWENS v. PFIZER, INC., et al
as 2:2002cv01390
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OWENS , DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS, DIRECT PURCHASER NON-CLASS, AND END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS , CVS PHARMACY, INC. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY
Pecial_master:
PAUL R. RICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
