Cases 1 - 6 of 6
X Corp v. World Federation of Advertisers et al
as 7:2024cv00114
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, World Federation of Advertisers, Orsted A/S and others
Plaintiff:
X Corp
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
CEMEX, INC. et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00269
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION, GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, CEMEX, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv00268
Plaintiff:
POTLATCHDELTIC CORPORATION, GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, CEMEX, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNILEVER N.V. et al
as 1:2011cv00858
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
UNILEVER N.V. , UNILEVER PLC , CONOPCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
GENERAL REFRACTORIES v. STONE CONTAINER, et al
as 2:1999cv01341
Plaintiff:
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY
Defendant:
STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION
Respondent:
PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA , MAYTAG CORPORATION , LANGER & GROGAN, P.C. and others
Movant:
CREST MEAT CO., INC. , FARMLAND FOODS, INC. , USG CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
