Banks and Banking Cases
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
American Express v. Romero
as 1:2008cv00679
Plaintiff: American Express
Defendant: Roger D. Romero
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Roger Romero v. Citibank USA, NA
as 08-15560
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROGER ROMERO
Defendant - Appellee: CITIBANK USA, NA
Rogers, et al v. United States, et al
as 08-1209
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN ROGERS
Plaintiff: URBAN RENEWAL CORP SHELTER CLIENTS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN GENERAL ASSISTANCE AND TANF CLIENTS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ONW=E STOP GENERAL ASSISTANCE AND TANF CLIENTS and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Taylor v. Walker et al
as 3:2007cv00706
Plaintiff: Corey A Taylor
Defendant: Roger Walker, Jr, Deanne Benos, Richard Bard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Citibank USA, NA v. Romero, et al.
as 1:2007cv00549
Plaintiff: Citibank USA, NA
Defendant: Roger Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Romero v. American Express Centurion Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00369
Plaintiff: Roger D. Romero
Defendant: American Express Centurion Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MBNA America Bank, NA v. Roger D. Romero
as 1:2007cv00166
Defendant: Roger D. Romero
Plaintiff: MBNA America Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roger D. Romero v. Citibank (South Dakota), NA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00164
Plaintiff: Roger D. Romero
Defendant: Citibank (South Dakota), NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Roger D. Romero v. MBNA America Bank, NA
as 1:2007cv00167
Plaintiff: Roger D. Romero
Defendant: MBNA America Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?