Cases 91 - 100 of 16,514
Yamamoto v. The Children's School
as 1:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Mika Yamamoto
Defendant:
The Children's School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roberts v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roberts
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romero v. The Village of Alsip et al
as 1:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
Javier Romero
Defendant:
The Village of Alsip, Alsip Police Officer T. Jusino and Alsip Police Officer V. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
Leonard Logan
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Glenn Evans, Alejandro Almazan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Robinhood Financial LLC
as 1:2024cv03829
Plaintiff:
Douglas D. Bennett
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gold-Smith v. Will County et al
as 1:2024cv03856
Plaintiff:
Robert Gold-Smith
Defendant:
Will County, Joseph Grozik, Policandriotis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Beatty v. Peoria Co. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Brandon J Beatty
Defendant:
Peoria County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boehmer v. Park et al
as 1:2024cv03855
Plaintiff:
Michael Boehmer
Defendant:
Village of Melrose Park, Officer Santillan, Officer Rossi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bishop v. CPO Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Bishop
Defendant:
CPO Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe v. Board of Education of Summit Hill School District 161 et al
as 1:2024cv02160
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SUMMIT HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT 161, Jack Mecher and Daniel Pierson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
