Cases 141 - 150 of 4,115
Nanez v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03162
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nanez
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03144
Plaintiff:
Isiah Jones
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Robert Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Almendarez v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Arthur Almendarez
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galvan v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03158
Plaintiff:
John Galvan
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Satanic Temple Inc. et al v. The City of Chicago
as 1:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
The Satanic Temple Inc. and Adam Vavrick
Defendant:
The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Frano et al
as 1:2023cv02724
Plaintiff:
Allen Robinson
Defendant:
Wayne Frano, Vincent Celio, Carl Brasic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughn Neita v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-1813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VAUGHN NEITA
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, KAREN RITTORNO, DOMINGO ENRIQUEZ, JR. and others
Freeman v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv02629
Plaintiff:
Tina Freeman
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Michele A Wood, Jose Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv02625
Plaintiff:
Mike Russell
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Vicky Perez, Andrew M Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv02645
Plaintiff:
Elliot Thomas
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and Officer Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
