Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Abitbol v. Corizon Health Care Services Supervising Medical Provider et al
as 2:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Rhonda R Abitbol
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services Supervising Medical Provider , Corizon Health Care Services Dentist , Corizon Health Care Services Physician and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunderson v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 1:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alan Gunderson
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Robert O Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Prison Administrator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Wyoming State Penitentiary et al
as 1:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Adrian L White
Defendant:
Wyoming State Penitentiary and Wyoming Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McAdams v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00263
Plaintiff:
Mark McAdams
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Robert O Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudolph v. Pederson et al
as 2:2011cv00264
Plaintiff:
Henry L Rudolph
Defendant:
Trent Pederson, Karen Stamm, Erin Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weldon v. Ramstad-Hvass et al
as 2:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
Steve Weldon
Defendant:
Sheryl Ramstad-Hvass, Joan Fabian, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison et al
as 2:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
Doreen Garrison , Norman Macintosh , Wyoming Association of Correctional Employees and others
Defendant:
State of Wyoming, Wyoming Department of Corrections, Robert Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Murphy et al
as 2:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miller and Hurie Purdiman, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Murphy, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, Robert Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
