Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Ramos v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv07773
Plaintiff:
Jorge Sr. Ramos
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and John Doe Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Clark et al
as 1:2013cv00989
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hicks
Defendant:
Barry Clark, Sonia Arvanitis, Edward Boswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffries v. Ramos
as 1:2012cv07376
Plaintiff:
Donald Jeffries
Defendant:
Yasir Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith vs. Ramirez, et. al.
as 1:2012cv00509
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
T Ramirez, #10974, I Ramos, #3823, I Valentin, # 18000 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon et al v. Panasonic et al
as 1:2011cv03417
Plaintiff:
Antron Cannon , Marcos Ramos and Charlton Horice
Defendant:
Panasonic, QPS Companies, Inc. and UTI Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramos et al v. River Grove et al
as 1:2010cv06480
Plaintiff:
George Ramos and Samantha Scanlon
Defendant:
Village of River Grove, Officer Krall, Officer Bianchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lally v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv05011
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Lally
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Jeff Gale, Sergeant Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leezer et al v. Shaw et al
as 1:2010cv01219
Plaintiff:
Claudia Leezer, Claudia Leezer, Claudia Leezer and others
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Terry McCann, Anthony Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Struck v. Cook County Public Guardian et al
as 1:2010cv00386
Plaintiff:
James T. Struck
Defendant:
Cook County Public Guardian, Leah Ramos and Jim Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ramos v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv01058
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramos
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Stanley, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
