Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Hoogveldt v. Adams et al
as 2:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Lee Hoogveldt
Defendant:
Ian Adams and West Jordan City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorg v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2014cv00128
Plaintiff:
John Adam Sorg
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Utah Mental Health, New Jersey Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorg v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
John Adam Sorg
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Utah Mental Department, New Jersey Mental Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorg v. Rewards for Justice et al
as 2:2013cv01068
Plaintiff:
John Adam Sorg
Defendant:
Rewards for Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Mackley v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Adam Mackley
Defendant:
Lynn Davis , Thomas Patton , Lorie Fowlke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorg v. Marcou et al
as 2:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
John Adam Sorg
Defendant:
Joe Marcou, Ricky Marcou, David Marcou and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Oakden et al v. Woods Cross Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
William C. Oakden, III and Karli Anne Miller
Defendant:
Woods Cross Police Department, Adam Osoro, West Bountiful City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2011cv00689
Plaintiff:
Linton Dale Livingston
Defendant:
State of Utah, Ann Boyden, Alicia Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Livingston et al v. York et al
as 2:2011cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dale Livingston and Fred Brunsvik
Defendant:
Louise York, Ted Stewart, Lindsey LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Adams et al
as 2:2011cv00658
Plaintiff:
Kristina Brown
Defendant:
Marilyn Dickson Adams, Michael Adams, William Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
