Cases 21 - 30 of 72
BLACK LIVES MATTER D.C. et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv01469
Defendant:
GREGORY T. MONAHAN, WILLIAM J. WALKER, JAMES C. MCCONVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
GARRETT BOND, J.N.C., KISHON MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
NELLSON v. U.S. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv00788
Defendant:
GREGORY MIMS, KATHRYN ARRINGTON, PHILIP HLAVAC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NELLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YEAGER v. NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO et al
as 1:2020cv00755
Defendant:
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, JARL MOHN, JOHN LANSING and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM YEAGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMOTHERS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2019cv02632
Plaintiff:
DANE SMOTHERS and DANE SMOTHERS, JR.
Defendant:
PATRICK MACKIN CAREY, GREGORY DEAN, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AZUBUKO v. BURDMAN et al
as 1:2019cv02550
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS' SUFFOLK SUPERIOR COURT, ALL JURORS TO THE CASE, PAULA M. CAREY and others
Plaintiff:
CHUKWUMA E. AZUBUKO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2019cv00641
Defendant:
GREGORY K. HARRIS and JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DORSEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2019cv00191
Defendant:
JONATHAN LAUDERDALE, GREGORY SHIFFER, BROCK VIGIL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DORSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STANLEY et al v. DUFF et al
as 1:2018cv01746
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. MCNEIL, LEE C. PRYMMER, WILLIAM B. MCGARVIN and others
Defendant:
JAMES DUFF and SHERYL WALTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ACKERS v. KERRY
as 1:2018cv01296
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ACKERS
Defendant:
JOHN KERRY and JAVAD ZARIF
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
SHAO v. KENNEDY et al
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
YI TAI SHAO
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
